On 07/11/2013 02:01 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I'm doing some work with the swigged Python bindings (not the pure
Python implementation of Qpid) and want to get some insight into how, if
at all, these bindings are being used by anybody currently.
Do you have a project that's using the Swig-generated bindings; i.e.,
the ones that are in the cqpid module? If so, how much do you feel it
would impact your development if we were to, in future, move these
bindings to a module named differently?
[ ] No impact
[ ] Some impact
[ ] Major impact
Would you prefer a module named something more like:
[ ] qpid_messaging
[ ] qpid.cmessaging
This one could bring some amount of complication as it would be offering
a new module within an existing package and so would be harder to
distribute separately. (I'm not opposed to the name, just pointing out
that it will take more work).
[ ] Please don't change the module
I appreciate your time and feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
