Dell - Internal Use - Confidential Thanks Everyone for quick response.. I am trying the suggestion I got so far from everyone, will send my finding to the group to get the feedback.. Thanks amit
-----Original Message----- From: NimbusParc [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 3:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: QPID AMQP Performance test Gordon Sim wrote > On 10/01/2013 06:47 AM, NimbusParc wrote: >> Which version of QPID you are using while testing ? >> In the recent version of QPID-0.24, the --tcp-nodelay became Yes by >> default. >> If you are using previous versions, you need to pass this argument >> to get better performance. > > Just for clarification, I suspect (given the executable names) that > the question was referring to proton messenger which is on its own > release cycle (0.5 being the latest) and where there is no tcp-nodelay option. Oh.. When answering to this question, i am just doing the same performance test for my C++ broker. At that time by seeing this question, i know this is about proton messenger but i don't know why i answered for the C++ broker. It was totally due to my deep involvement in testing the C++ broker. Excuse me and What you answered above is very good with clear explanation. Gordon Sim wrote > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] -- View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/QPID-AMQP-Performance-test-tp7598833p7598855.html Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
