On 10/05/2013 11:15 AM, Fraser Adams wrote:
Hey all,
To be honest I don't tend to use persistence much as my requirements
tend to be more performance than reliability leaning, but it has just
struck me that recent qpid builds seem to have a different approach than
previously.
Back in the day IIRC I ended up getting the store from here
http://qpidcomponents.org/download.html
But I *think* there's something in the main repo now - I noticed a
directory "../qpid/qpid-trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/legacystore", however
I've also noticed on doing a fresh "cmake .." to build with Proton the
cmake results say "Legacystore is excluded from build."
I'm guessing one of the dependencies is not installed or perhaps that
some assumptions in the cmake build are unintentionally platform specific.
You should be able to get a better message if you force
BUILD_LEGACYSTORE on.
Is there any documentation for this anywhere? I couldn't see any links
here: http://qpid.apache.org/components/cpp-broker/index.html nor here:
http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-0.24/cpp-broker/book/index.html
BTW the broker book still says:
1.1. Running a Qpid C++ Broker
1.1.1. Building the C++ Broker and Client Libraries
The root directory for the C++ distribution is named qpidc-0.4. The
README file in that directory gives instructions for building the broker
and client libraries. In most cases you will do the following:
[qpidc-0.4]$ ./configure
[qpidc-0.4]$ make
Should probably be updated with cmake now that autotools has been
deprecated.
Yes, well spotted, thanks for highlighting that! I've raised a JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5209
Am I just being thick or are there really no references about
building/enabling C++ broker persistence? (The README and INSTALL don't
cover it either).
Now that the code is all in the same tree (for both windows and linux)
we should be able to do a much better job. I've raised a JIRA for this
also: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5208
Also what are the differences between "legacystore"
and the original one from qpid components. To be honest the name
"legacystore" doesn't *really* inspire confidence either, is this
suggesting that there's another, somehow better, persistence store - if
so where?
You certainly make a good point. AFAIK the reason for that name was the
desire to update the store to be fully asynchronous
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3858)
Sorry for being a pain - I blame starting to play with Proton for
causing me to pay more heed to various messages :->
You are most definitely not being a pain! Pointing out the problems is
the first step in getting them fixed. I've marked the JIRAs above as
blockers for the next release.
I'm hoping someone volunteers to address them, but if not I'll get them
fixed before the first RC (Justin, keep me honest!).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
