I don't think there's any reason why there should be a difference to the provider in the 0-8/9/10 client... probably some copy & paste error :)
-- Rob On 12 December 2013 19:20, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > The current AMQP 1.0 JMS client's JNDI provider implementation seems a > little odd to me (i.e. org.apache.qpid.amqp_1_0.jms.jndi. > PropertiesFileInitialContextFactory ). > > It forces you to specify a provider url[1], but treats that as a file, > making it hard (impossible) to get at a properties file packaged as a > resource. > > Is this intentional? Am I missing or misunderstanding something? > > --Gordon. > > [1] The equivalent implementation from the old JMS client (i.e. 0-10 etc), > from which this seems to have been copied, doesn't require a provider url, > so though it has the same treatment of the 'url' as a file path, it doesn't > require you to use that (you can load via getResourceAsStream() or > equivalent). > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
