On 03/28/2014 12:53 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 03/28/2014 11:22 AM, Chris Richardson wrote:
Static routes might be ok for a prototype, but a production system would
have many hundreds or even thousands of clients frequently being added
and
removed. My assumption is that a static configuration would incur a much
higher management overhead?
It really depends on the messaging patterns between the clients. At one
extreme, if each client was using the same 'topic' (whether sending or
receiving), then the static configuration would be very simple. At the
other extreme if each client would require extra routes to be defined,
then yes, that would be an unwieldy solution most likely.
Putting the question a better way, how many different exchanges will you
be using and what will be the type of the exchange(s)?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
