I'm planning to look at QPID-5771 tomorrow, fairly sure I know where the problem will be...as Gordon said however, these aren't really blockers
Robbie On 21 May 2014 18:58, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > FYI: due to the delayed list traffic, I followed up with Rob and Robbie > > directly on this. The issue turns out to be a small change to the > behaviour > > of the java broker meaning that subscribing to a node with source address > > 'amq.fanout' will no longer bind correctly to the exchange. The > workaround > > is to use 'amq.fanout/' instead (with qpid::messaging this means you'll > > need additional quotes to stop the library parsing the / itself). Rob > has a > > patch to restore the previous behaviour. (Thanks to Rob and Robbie for > > their help!). > > > > I also ran into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5771 while > > exploring the above, but other than these (which are not blockers), the > > release seems ok to me. > > > I haven't seen any activity on these issues. Should I proceed with the > vote? > > Justin >
