On 20 August 2014 11:04, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 19 August 2014 22:47, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Here's a preview of what I've got going. This example run is against > > trunk, but the same structure would be reflected into 0.30. Note that > the > > dispatch and proton artifacts get removed before doing the "Qpid" > release. > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jross/quirk/20140819/ > > http://people.apache.org/~jross/quirk/20140819/java-binaries/ > > > > I added qpid-qmf2, Fraser's stuff; I'm thinking about renaming the > archive > > to qpid-java-qmf-tools. > > > Yeah, its a bit annoying to name, and not aided by the existing artifact > names. > > > > Correspondingly, the python tools archive is back > > to being just python code > > > > The java binaries are now precisely the same as "mvn package" generates. > > > > Great > > > > These include websocket and perftests binaries that no one has yet > > expressed a desire for. > > > > If we distribute the client websocket plugin, we should update the broker > to depend on it so its binary includes the matching broker plugin. I'll do > that now. > Great - thanks Robbie - not sure why I didn't add that to the broker in the first place > > I'd be fine without the perftests binary being included. We have never > distributed it in the past, and the maven build is currently set not to > deploy any of the output for that module as a result, which we should > perhaps change if we want to begin distributing it on the site. It is only > being built because the old Ant build system had an optional way to do so, > and in the end I tied it to the package phase for consistency with the > other modules. I did consider leaving it requiring a more typical explicit > "mvn assembly:single" invocation to create that archive, saving the > precious ~0.x seconds and additional storage during the build process ;) > Yeah - I'm not sure there's a whole lot of value in distributing the perftests module. If people think there is value in distributing it, I'm fine with that too though. -- Rob
