Thanks, all approved. On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Keith W <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Justin > > Two more to add to the list: > > QPID-6079 Some python AlternateExchangeTests fail against Java broker (and > leave behind an exchange that cannot be deleted) > > This corrects a problem that causes an inconsistency in the registry of > exchanges within the Java Broker exposed by one of the Python test. There > is no reasonable work around for the user. Patched by Rob, reviewed by me. > rev r1622961 and r1623055 > > QPID-6080 Distinguish between empty message body and no message body for > 0-10 messages > > This corrects a regression around the handling of messages with no content. > There is no reasonable work around for the user. Patched by Rob, > reviewed by me. r1622968 > > Kind regards, Keith. > > On 5 September 2014 23:29, Keith W <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Justin > > > > May I request one more defect fix in 0.30? I expect this will be the > last > > request from me. > > > > QPID-6068 NPE encountered whilst editing JMX_CONNECTOR port > > revs 1622677,1622747,1622768 > > > > This jira fixes an issue encountered when the user edits certain ports of > > the Java Broker. There is no reasonable work around for the user. > > Changes reviewed by Rob and me. > > > > Thanks again. > > >
