On 03/17/2015 05:21 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On 17 March 2015 at 16:56, Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 03/16/2015 07:53 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Hi all,
We have reached a point that it would be useful to do an initial
release of the new Proton-based JMS client, so I have put up an RC for
folks to test and vote on.
The source and binary archives can be grabbed from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/jms/0.1.0-rc1/
Those and the other individual maven artifacts are also staged for now at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1030
I will close the vote some point towards the end of the week. I'll be
off on vacation by then so the exact timing is a little fuzzy but it
will be after 72hrs are up, i.e after 8pm GMT on Thursday 19th.
The binary tarball includes a netty jar, but I didn't see any mention of
that in the notice? There is a mention in the license file of slf4j, but
again not for netty. Although it is also Apache licensed, shouldn't there be
some explicit note of it?
Dependencies that are Apache licensed dont need mentioned in the
licence file, only really those that aren't Apache licensed, such as
SLF4J. For the notice file, we didnt include anything for netty as the
jar doesnt incorporate any notices. Doing a quick search of
apache.org, I didn't see any other projects using it having entries in
notice for it.
Ok, +1 from me on the release then.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
