On 28 August 2015 at 15:37, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/28/2015 02:58 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >> >> Looking at it this it appears to be a problem with the test itelf, >> where it could be susceptible to slowdown of the broker interactions >> when run on slowers machines. I actually already mentioned to Tim >> earlier in the week that I might convert those particular set of tests >> so they dont use a broker, this would be another reason to. >> >> From the time taken listed it looks like the machine you are using is >> possibly very slow. I havent seen this test fail personally or on the >> various slow CI systems they are running on, so I don't think I would >> class it as a blocker. > > > I would agree. I'll run some manual tests then vote. >
Great. I am starting on reworking those tests. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
