On 10/02/2015 01:28 PM, Suman.Patro-TRN wrote:
I would like to know the speed of request reply pattern in Qpid in comparison to YAMI4 broker(wire- level protocol based)
Speed can mean different things here. There is the latency of the request-response roundtrip and there is the throughput of many of these if they are sent asynchronously.
I'm not aware of any benchmarks focused specifically on this pattern, so you would need to do some experimentation yourself.
, mosquitto broker(mqtt based), rabbit mq(amqp based, zeromq(brokerless solution)
Just as an aside, MQTT doesn't really directly support request-response. It is designed around pub-sub. You can of course invent a convention on top of that yourself.
I believe that the various Qpid intermediaries (there is a Java broker, a c++ broker and a router) would compare very favourably with RabbitMQ as regards both latency and throughput.
Note also that with AMQP 1.0 you can do direct, non-intermediated request-response as well, more like the basic REQ-REP pattern in zeromq. Further, its not too difficult to write your code in such a way that it can be used wither with direct- or with intermediated- communication.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
