Go for it.  I need to make progress on the cpp tree reorg, so I'd very
much appreciate it.

Justin

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Robbie Gemmell
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 14 December 2015 at 18:14, aconway <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 18:11 +0000, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>>> I have a candidate proton-j change that I'd like to see in a JMS
>>> client release, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1077, so
>>> I'd be onboard with doing a 0.11.1 to get that too. Anyone else have
>>> things warranting inclusion in a 0.11.1?
>>
>> Me, me!
>> 0af481e PROTON-1059: ruby binding broken in 0.11 release and on master
>>
>> Already on the 0.11.x branch.
>>
>>
>
> Hehe, I meant anything in addition to that one, given the mail is a
> bit old now :)
>
> I'm not sure if Justin had any thoughts on this, but I'd be happy to
> cut an RC tomorrow if nobody objects or has other things for
> inclusion.
>
> Robbie

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to