On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 20:16 +0000, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 16/03/16 15:51, Flores, Paul A. wrote:
> > 
> > The discussion has focused on the following:
> > 
> > path 1: use request/reply "framework" with requester explicitly
> > listening for the reply, blocking processing until reply has been
> > received.
> This pattern is used a lot (including in all the management tools
> for 
> the c++ broker).
> 
> > 
> > path 2: using direct receive (i.e. proton example) accepting
> > message only after processing has been completed.
> If I understand correctly, the idea here is to use message 
> acknowledgement instead of an explicit reply message? If so, that
> only 
> really works where the reply has no content 

It also doesn't work if messages are queued on a broker or some other
intermediary since you'll get acknowledgement from the broker before
the real server has seen the message. It can work in a direct peer-peer 
communication but path 1 is more robust.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to