+1 On 20 April 2016 at 01:03, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Short version: > As per the title, I'd like to vote on moving the website bits to a Git > repo, specifically "qpid-site". > > Further info: > The site is one of the single largest groups of stuff we have, both > with regard to its previous release content and for the additions of > various new releases as they occur. That's in terms of both overall > file size and especially the overall number of files. On the latter > point, this makes using Subversion particularly slow; for example it > took well over 30mins just to check in the website updates I made > yesterday. I literally had to leave and come back later because it > took so long. > > Support for Git based sites have been offered by infra for some time > now [1]. Things work in essentially the same manner to our current > Subversion based site, whereby upon checkin the 'content' bits then > get published to the web servers. The only real difference is that the > site stuff must exist in the 'asf-site' branch of a particular git > repo, either the same one as general code or just a dedicated separate > repo. In our case a dedicated repo seems to makes the most sense, and > again it seems to be what various other projects do (even the > otherwise single-repo projects). > > [1] https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available > > Robbie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
