Hello Justin,

 

When do
you think you will have time to fix those issues?

 

Regards,

Adel
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Qpid C++ 0.34 unit tests are failing with visual studio 2013
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 18:31:29 +0200
> 
> In env.py.in, all libraries are ".so" extension which will not work on 
> Windows as you will need ".dll" instead
> 
> _export_module("HA_LIB", join(BUILD_DIR, "src", 
> "ha.so"))_export_module("XML_LIB", join(BUILD_DIR, "src", 
> "xml.so"))_export_module("AMQP_LIB", join(BUILD_DIR, "src", 
> "amqp.so"))_export_module("TEST_STORE_LIB", join(BUILD_DIR, "src", "tests", 
> "test_store.so"))_export_module("STORE_LIB", join(BUILD_DIR, "src", 
> "linearstore.so"))
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: Qpid C++ 0.34 unit tests are failing with visual studio 2013
> > Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:49:46 +0200
> > 
> > In qmf_tests, in brokertest.py, there is something wrong with the path 
> > because the script cannot find "qpidd" executable. If you add the ".exe" 
> > extension then it works.
> > I noticed that all other tests use "common.py" for qpidd. So why is this 
> > test different?
> > Fixing the path makes the test pass and it fixes the same error in other 
> > tests.
> > Error: AssertionError: executable not found: qpiddFix: qpidd_exec = 
> > "qpidd.exe" (In brokertest.py)
> > Regards,Adel
> > 
> > > Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:59:34 -0700
> > > Subject: Re: Qpid C++ 0.34 unit tests are failing with visual studio 2013
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > 
> > > Yeah, that's a simple bug on my end.  I'll get that fixed and report back.
> > > 
> > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Adel Boutros <[email protected]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Also, in env.ps1.in, there is a reference to "$builddir" but it never 
> > > > has
> > > > value so the tests needing PYTHON_DIR will always fail.
> > > > $PYTHON_DIR="$builddir\python" ---> is interpreted as "\python"
> > > > I think there is a missing link between "$builddir" and some Cmake
> > > > variable.
> > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: RE: Qpid C++ 0.34 unit tests are failing with visual studio 
> > > > > 2013
> > > > > Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:31:44 +0200
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello Justin,
> > > > > So I launched all the tests and I have 10 failing including the
> > > > unit_tests (There is a disconnection error which I can also see in your
> > > > appveyor).
> > > > >
> > > > > The following tests FAILED:     4 - federation_tests (Failed)   5 -
> > > > flow_control_tests (Timeout)        6 - ha_tests (Failed)   9 -
> > > > python_tests (Failed)      11 - qmf_tests (Failed)         14 -
> > > > interlink_tests (Failed)   15 - interop_tests (Timeout)    16 - 
> > > > store_tests
> > > > (Failed)       17 - store_tests_clfs (Failed)
> > > > > For the store_tests, powershell scripts in current directory cannot be
> > > > launched as they are not trusted, so you should add ".\" prior to the
> > > > script name.
> > > > > C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe
> > > > "run_store_tests.ps1" "MSSQL"The error message is helpful
> > > > actually:run_store_tests.ps1 : The term 'run_store_tests.ps1' is not
> > > > recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function... Suggestion [3,General]: 
> > > > The
> > > > command run_store_tests.ps1 was not found, but does exist in the current
> > > > location. Windows PowerShell does not load commands from the current
> > > > location by default. If you trust this command, instead type
> > > > ".\run_store_tests.ps1". See "get-help about_Command_Precedence" for 
> > > > more
> > > > details.
> > > > > I am still debugging the other tests.
> > > > > Have you had a better luck than mine?
> > > > > I can send you the test logs if you like.
> > > > > PS: I am compiling with SASL/SSL disabled and valgrind disabled also
> > > > completely.
> > > > > Regards,Adel
> > > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > Subject: RE: Qpid C++ 0.34 unit tests are failing with visual studio
> > > > 2013
> > > > > > Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:02:40 +0200
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please ignore my last email. There was a problem with the PATH
> > > > environment variable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: Qpid C++ 0.34 unit tests are failing with visual 
> > > > > > > studio
> > > > 2013
> > > > > > > Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 11:40:58 +0200
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello Justin,
> > > > > > > I updated to the head of the trunk and relaunched everything. I
> > > > still have a problem with the qpid tools.I can see all the bat files, 
> > > > but
> > > > the code still calls the original files for example:
> > > > > > > 1: run_acl_tests: Calling 'qpid-python-test --broker 
> > > > > > > localhost:63666
> > > > --time -m acl -Dport-i=63668 -Dport-u=63710 -Dport-q=63712
> > > > -Dpolicy-file=D:\qpid-cpp-trunk.git\qpid\qpid\cpp\build-dir-RelWithDebInfo\src\tests\policy.acl'1:
> > > > 'qpid-python-test' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
> > > > > > > All the .py files have not been updated to launch
> > > > qpid-python-test.bat when on windows:Example:
> > > > qpid/cpp/src/tests/run_interop_testscall("qpid-python-test -m 
> > > > interop_tests
> > > > -DOUTDIR={0}", WORK_DIR)
> > > > > > > Regards,Adel
> > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:02:59 -0700
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Qpid C++ 0.34 unit tests are failing with visual
> > > > studio 2013
> > > > > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > An update.  I think I've fixed the python and backslash 
> > > > > > > > problems.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7281
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here's what I get now in appveyor:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ssorj/qpid-svn-reorg/build/hammerandtong.71
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The unit_test failure is one I've had for a long time.  I've not
> > > > yet been
> > > > > > > > able to convince either appveyor to use "localhost" for its
> > > > hostname or
> > > > > > > > unit_test to use "appveyor-vm" as its ssl cert name.  So it 
> > > > > > > > times
> > > > out.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The other tests are running now, with some failures.  Note that 
> > > > > > > > up
> > > > to now
> > > > > > > > I've been liberal in enabling the cross-platform tests that can
> > > > > > > > hypothetically work in windows.  There may be specific instances
> > > > where I'm
> > > > > > > > wrong, and we'll need to adjust the target platform for the 
> > > > > > > > test.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Andrew Stitcher <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 09:38 -0700, Justin Ross wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I tried this approach first.  I wasn't able to make that
> > > > > > > > > > configuration
> > > > > > > > > > available in CTestCustom.cmake when I tried last.  However, 
> > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > think I
> > > > > > > > > > tried repeating the find_package logic directly in the
> > > > custom.cmake
> > > > > > > > > > file,
> > > > > > > > > > which I will do.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > CMake is hierarchical so the find_package() would need to be 
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > a CMake
> > > > > > > > > file above the relevant one (and perhaps in the sequence 
> > > > > > > > > before
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > > add_directory(..) or include(...) that includes the file you
> > > > want the
> > > > > > > > > definition in - I'm not too clear about that point.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >                                       
>                                         
                                          

Reply via email to