On 15 July 2016 at 09:16, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been working with the security pages recently, and there are two > things I propose. > > First, I'd like to simplify the way we include the full CVE content. > Instead of embedding it in the CVE table as a show/hide element, I'd like > to link out to an independent page. I think this will make it a little > easier to author, avoid what will become a giant page, and give the CVE its > own URL. > > Under this plan, the tables would remain as they are now, but the full CVE > would be hosted at a standard location. The table would simply link to the > CVE page. > > input/cves/CVE-2016-9999.md > output/cves/CVE-2016-9999.html > > Second, a small thing. I will add links from the component pages to their > contained security pages. Right now you have to navigate from the > top-level security page.
Sounds reasonable to me. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
