Hi,
Working at a client site and have run into an interesting question. The current implementation plan is to use a unique "reply to" address (queue) to handle synchronous request reply. At this point we have a local broker so we have a single connection with a single session. We are also planning to use the "next_receiver" functionality so we can "loop" through various queues to dispatch message contents to related processes. Questions are: Could "next_receiver" conceivably end up reading from a unique "reply to" queue? If so does that mean we should use a different session (senders and receivers) for synchronous processing? Thanks for comments and insights. Paul ________________________________ This communication (including any attachments) may contain information that is proprietary, confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that further dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who received this message in error should notify the sender immediately by telephone or by return email and delete it from his or her computer.
