Is this the qpid C++ broker or the Java broker? What version? The usual 'insanely low performance' numbers come from using no prefetch and durable message store.
The C++ source has a perf-test suite ready to go. Take a peek there and see how they did it. >From the qpid-cpp repository running the C++ qpidd broker on my ThinkPad W541 laptop just now: ===== /home/user/qpid-cpp/build/src/tests> ./qpid-perftest Processing 1 messages from qpid-perftest_sub_ready . done. Sending start 1 times to qpid-perftest_pub_start Processing 1 messages from qpid-perftest_pub_done . done. Processing 1 messages from qpid-perftest_sub_done . done. Total 1000000 transfers of 1024 bytes in 12.538 seconds. Publish transfers/sec: 40625.3 Average: 40625.3 Subscribe transfers/sec: 39502.7 Average: 39502.7 Total transfers/sec: 79757.7 Total Mbytes/sec: 77.8884 ===== ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul A. Flores" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 12:55:04 PM > Subject: Benchmarking Guidance > > At client site. > > > Client junior staff member tasked with performing qpid broker benchmarking > generated results showing averages of seconds per message to send and > receive messages! I have been tasked to review the approach taken and would > like to tap into the "wisdom" of this group for guidance. > > > Insights and inputs are welcomed. > > > Paul > > > ________________________________ > > This communication (including any attachments) may contain information that > is proprietary, confidential or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the > intended recipient, please note that further dissemination, distribution, > use or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who > received this message in error should notify the sender immediately by > telephone or by return email and delete it from his or her computer. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
