I think it's okay to proceed without the core lib in the install result. On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
> While looking into what might be involved to fix the install issue, I > found that Andrew actually noticed and corrected it on Thursday, > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid-proton/commit/16da86eb. He > didn't raise it as a reason to stop the release, which could be taken > as him thinking it wasn't one, although he hasn't voted either way > yet. > > Whilst I agree its a bit silly given it is the first release the > 'core' bit is to be in, if it doesnt break existing stuff (with votes > thus far suggesting it does not) then I am inclined to proceed with > release given the fix is trivial and folks building the source can > easily adjust it themselves should they want to use it before the next > release. Does anyone strongly disagree? > > I also want to begin the process of making proton-j and proton-c > independent, with this release needing finished before I do, and > respinning would delay that until next year as I'll be taking vacation > from the weekend. I aim to release proton-c and proton-j again very > soon after that work is done to really complete the process, so the > next release isn't going to be far away at this point anyway. > > Robbie > > On 9 December 2016 at 21:36, Chuck Rolke <[email protected]> wrote: > > +0 > > > > Observed that file qpid-proton-core[d].dll is built in all cases but > > installed in none. If that's acceptable then +1. > > > > * Verified MD5 > > > > * Compiled on VisualStudio cross product of > > [2008, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2015] > > [x86, x64] > > [Debug, RelWithDebInfo] > > > > * Ran several self tests on random builds - all OK. > > > > * Ran several helloworld cpp examples - all OK. > > > > * Did NOT try against any Qpidd instances. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Robbie Gemmell" <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 12:26:01 PM > >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.16.0 > >> > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> I have put together a first spin for a 0.16.0 Qpid Proton release, > please > >> test it and vote accordingly. > >> > >> The source archive can be grabbed from: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.16.0-rc1/ > >> > >> The maven artifacts for proton-j are staged for now at: > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1094 > >> > >> The JIRAs currently assigned are: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12313720&version=12338399 > >> > >> It is tagged as 0.16.0-rc1 from the 0.16.x branch. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Robbie > >> > >> > >> P.S. If you want to test things out using maven (e.g with your own > build) > >> you can temporarily add this to your poms to access the staging repo: > >> > >> <repositories> > >> <repository> > >> <id>staging</id> > >> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/ > repositories/orgapacheqpid-1094</url> > >> </repository> > >> </repositories> > >> > >> The dependency for proton-j would then be: > >> > >> <dependency> > >> <groupId>org.apache.qpid</groupId> > >> <artifactId>proton-j</artifactId> > >> <version>0.16.0</version> > >> </dependency> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
