+1 on move the new (client) repo to git.

I can't see any compelling reason to create a git mirror of this new svn
location - we should just be targeting moving all the components onto git
this year.

-- Rob

On 9 February 2017 at 12:38, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The LICENCE and NOTICE files in the new repo will need updating. I
> also wondered if the qpid-jms-amqp-0-x-test-utils utils module could
> just be factored out? It doesnt seem like its going to be adding
> significant value in the new repo to warrant the new module.
>
> I also wondered about the plan for completing the clients new
> repo/area in terms of things like: git mirror, GitHub mirror, GitHub
> integrations, Travis/Appveyor CI builds? I ask as it occurs to me that
> now would be the next best time to move the repo to Git, before that
> work is done, as it would be less work overall for us and infra, cause
> less disruption for everyone over time, and give us a better result
> now. As I understand things from prior moves, doing so necessitates
> infra recreate the Git and GitHub mirrors (plus redo all the
> integrations), which in case of the latter also breaks existing forks
> off on their own. Given this isnt the first time some of this stuff
> has moved it would seem nice not to have to distrupt things yet again
> later and get such changes out the way now. Benefits would be avoiding
> creating repeated work (mainly for infra, but us too), reducing hassle
> for devs/'users', doing away with the annoying sync delays of the
> current multi-hop system (it took 32 minutes for the most recent
> commit to sync end to end and close its related GitHub PR), and being
> consistent within the project.
>
> Robbie
>
> On 7 February 2017 at 20:44, Keith W <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I made an initial commit on QPID-7622 separating Qpid Broker for Java
> > from the Qpid JMS 0-x Client. The client now lives at
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/qpid-jms-amqp-0-x.  More commits
> > will follow over the next few days to eliminate the client-only code
> > from the broker.  There are also a few refactorings needed in the
> > Broker before the 0-8 and 0-10 protocol code can be moved to their
> > respective plugin modules.
> >
> > I have refactored Jenkins to take account of the changes and will be
> > monitoring it for the next few days.
> >
> > Moving the Broker to JDK 1.8 will take place soon once the dust has
> > settled, under a separate JIRA.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12 January 2017 at 18:13, Keith W <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> So, for the moment, I suggest these components remain SVN in the
> following way:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/java/  - will continue to house
> >>>> everything it houses today (Broker, Integration Tests etc) except for
> >>>> 0-x client and 0-x client docs.
> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/qpid-jms-client-amqp-0-x  - a
> >>>> new repository  created for the rehired 0-x client.  The Maven
> >>>> artefact name will remain unchanged (qpid-client)
> >>>
> >>> I'd be fine with that (maybe drop 'client' from the 'repo' name to
> >>> align, and avoid containing the other clients artifact name).
> >>
> >> I'm happy with the suggestion to drop the 'client' part. So, that would
> give us:
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/qpid-jms-amqp-0-x
> >>
> >>
> >>> That
> >>> said, having made the transition a few times now its worth saying its
> >>> not that much effort normally, especially compared to the rest of the
> >>> change here. In some ways I think making the changes would be less
> >>> painful if done while/after moving to git, and similarly for any
> >>> ongoing backporting efforts. It is a while since a move was deferred
> >>> for the last reorg :)
> >>
> >> I think I'd prefer to do the tree surgery in svn.  I'm hoping (unless
> >> there are more comments on this thread) this work can be done next
> >> week.
> >> Once the new structure is settled down. I'll look to schedule the move
> >> to git as soon as we can.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to