On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 15:06 +0000, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 13/02/17 15:01, Alan Conway wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 11:48 +0000, Gordon Sim wrote:
> > > On 07/02/17 20:40, pqvchen1 wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to figure out if QPID Messaging API supports AMQP
> > > > 1.0
> > > > for ruby?
> > > > the document only says it supports multiple language and
> > > > version
> > > > 1.0, 0-10.
> > > > So Not sure if the ruby sample given in this link :
> > > > https://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-0.32/index.html is for
> > > > AMQP
> > > > 1.0?
> > > 
> > > The ruby qpid messaging client is a swigged wrapper around the
> > > c++
> > > implementation of the API, and the c++ supports 1.0.
> > > 
> > > However, I'm not sure what the state of the ruby binding is at
> > > present.
> > > I've not really used much and not for a very long time. Trying
> > > now I
> > > was
> > > unable to get the examples to run at all.
> > > 
> > > The .rb files don't seem to get installed, just the .so file. The
> > > qpid_messaging.rb file also requires cqpid, whereas the .so is
> > > cqpid_ruby. Modifying the qpid_messaging.rb asa qcuik test, I
> > > then
> > > got
> > > unresolved symbol errors. Is there perhaps supposed to be some
> > > other
> > > component that bridges between these?
> > > 
> > > Anyone else more familiar with how to run the ruby stuff?
> > 
> > It is in need of some love. I am the owner now so that would be my
> > job.
> > The binding itself is in working shape but the examples, tests and
> > installer are in various stages of disrepair, I need to get those
> > back
> > in order. I'll get to that soon as Ruby and Python are targets for
> > simplification to use the C connection_driver with native
> > Ruby/Python
> > IO, and I will need to get the ruby binding back on track to do
> > that.
> 
> Thi is the qpid messaging binding, not the proton one.

Gahh, sorry. No idea about that one.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to