+1 (non binding) Thanks, Madhawa
Madhawa On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 March 2017 at 01:33, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, everyone. This our first release candidate for the Qpid Python > 1.36.0 > > release. Please test in your environment, report what you find, and then > > vote to approve or reject the release. > > > > Source distribution: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/python/1.36.0-rc1/ > > > > Tag: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-python.git;a= > shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.36.0-rc1 > > > > Branch: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-python.git;a= > shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.36.x > > > > Issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion% > 20%3D%20qpid-python-1.36.0%20AND%20project%20%3D%20QPID > > +1 > > I tested the RC out as follows: > - Verified the signature and checksum files (note the .sha changed to > SHA-256). > - Checked LICENCE+NOTICE files present, year updated in the latter. > - Ran RAT on the extracted archive. > - Did a user local install of the package. > - Ran the hello example against Qpid Broker for Java 6.1.1. > > Robbie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
