Indeed, but I would not need an extra port in this case. Also, the extra management port could be used by mistake by any misconfigured consumer/producer.
________________________________ From: Jiri Danek <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 12:04:50 PM To: users Subject: Re: Dispatch router 2-phase start On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Adel Boutros <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Gordon, > > > With what you are proposing, the order of the configuration becomes > critical because if the public listener is configured before the connectors > and autolinks, I would have the same issue with the producer/consumer. So > my management process would have to send the management commands in a > predefined order. > > > In the case of the 2-phase start, the order of configuration is irrelevant > and the management is thus easier. > > > Regards, > > Adel > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Adel Boutros <[email protected]> wrote: > Once all dynamic configuration is done, we send a management message to > allow the router to start accepting connections. So even with the 2-phase startup you'd have to keep the order of commands in mind. You'd have to send this special startup command last. -- Jiří Daněk Messaging QA
