Hi Adel
On 18 October 2017 at 11:39, Adel Boutros <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello guys, > > > While testing the tableNamePrefix, we noticed a bug and a very slow > performance on Oracle Database. > > I have submitted 2 jiras one for each and a pull request on the master of > qpid-broker-j. > Belated thanks. > > So I was wondering if they are accepted if it is possible to backport them to > 6.1 branch and release 6.1.5 with these fixed? > Yes, that should be no problem. There are a couple of things we would like to include in a 6.1,x defect fix. Making these part of that should be no problem. We regard to timing, hands are full at the moment with the Qpid Broker v7 (hopefully there will be an RC out in just over a week), after that attention will turn to the Qpid JMS Client AMQP 0-x (the 6.3.0 release - mainly to completely cleanly separate from the Broker J) and the defect fixes due on the 6.1.x line. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7973 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7974 > > > PS 1: Do not hesitate to change my commits or propose enhancements. > > PS 2: Is travis connected at qpid-broker-j on github so I can see if my pull > request does not fail the build? > We use Apache CI instance. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Qpid/ Sometimes we do see spurious failures on some of the slower slaves. > > Regards, > > Adel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
