Rob, The binary bundle names and jar names were left unchanged in v7.0. They are the same is in 6.x. That might help people having downloads automated. We also publish binary bundles into maven. We agreed before to keep the maven artefacts unchanged. Though, I would also prefer to name bundles using qpid-broker-j-.*. I personally even would vote to rename broker jars into qpid-broker-j-.*. The source bundle was named in similar way as the source bundle for qpid-java but we missed to rename directory "qpid-java-7.0.0" inside of the source bundle. It is definitely a bug. Though, nothing stops us from repackaging of the source bundle and renaming folder there for v7.0. I'll raise JIRA about renaming distribution bundles into qpid-broker-j-.*.
Kind Regards, Alex On 7 November 2017 at 15:29, Rob Godfrey <rob.j.godf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 November 2017 at 15:14, Oleksandr Rudyy <oru...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've built Qpid Broker-J 7.0.0 RC2. The following issues have been resolved >> since RC1: >> >> * QPID-7998 - [Broker-J] Allow global shared subscriptions but discard >> their links on detach >> * QPID-8019 - [Broker-J][WMC] Change link to broker documentation in web >> management console >> >> Qpid Broker-J 7.0 brings the following major changes: >> >> * Improved AMQP 1.0 support >> * Support for AMQP JMS Mapping Version 1.0 WD09 >> * Support for JMS 2.0 shared subscriptions (QPIDJMS-220) >> * Improved message conversion for applications using different AMQP >> protocols >> * Improved direct memory management >> >> The list of new features, defect fixes and improvements can be found in >> Jira: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% >> 3D%20QPID%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20qpid-java-broker-7.0.0 >> >> The source and binary archives can be grabbed from here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/broker-j/7.0.0-rc2 >> >> > Out of interest, is there a reason why these archives are named > "qpid-broker-7.0.0*", with the src then being within a "qpid-java-7.0.0" > directory? Would it not make more sense for these to both be > "qpid-broker-j-7.0.0"? > > Certainly not a blocker for me, just seems a little inconsistent. > > -- Rob > > >> Those files and the other maven artifacts are also staged for now at: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1120 >> >> Please test and cast your vote accordingly. >> >> Kind regards >> >> P.S. If you want to test it out using maven, you can temporarily add this >> to your poms to access >> the staging repo: >> >> <repositories> >> <repository> >> <id>staging</id> >> <url> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1120 >> </url> >> </repository> >> </repositories> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
