Hi Tim, Thanks for tracking this issue to version 6.0.7. I will try to reproduce your issue over weekend to understand what exactly happens on broker bounce. Do you use cpp or java broker?
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 19:44, lizzrd <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you Gordon. I will use your advice and use QPID JMS 0.40.0 with JMS > 2.0 API and AMPQ 1.0. This version works the way I expected and handles > more than one ConcurrentConsumer > > For any one working on QPID client 6.3.3. I did not find any issues with > version 6.0.0 - 6.0.6. The high CPU issue where a > DefaultMessageListenerContainer has more than one ConcurrentConsumer > appears > in version 6.0.7 - 6.3.3. While I did not test every version, I did spot > check quite a few. > > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Apache-Qpid-users-f2158936.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
