Still waiting for the other issue, but it does seem likely its a bug in the updated codec bits from the detail available and would be a regression...so coupled with the python issue, I've decided it makes sense just to cancel the vote for now and get those fixes.
Robbie On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 18:25, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This one it seems isnt a regression, though has been described as > 'potentially nasty', noted. Still waiting on more details around the > other thing which would be a regression. Will leave the vote open > further still and decide when that one is clear. > > On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 10:23, Jiri Daněk <jda...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > +- "?" > > > > A GitHub PR has been opened, which suggests there might be a refcounting > > issue in the Python binding. https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/360. > > Looking at the history of the relevant code, it looks to me that the PR is > > trying to fix reference counting in code last updated in PROTON-2430, which > > was already released as Proton 0.36.0. Therefore, whatever issue the > > contributor is trying to solve, this is not a release-to-release regression. > > > > If they are using only released pypi packages, then I think this is the > > earliest they got the code to their hands and can report an issue, though. > > -- > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards > > Jiri Daněk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
