Hi, I think it's better to wait for the main developers to provide a clean solution. But I need oauth will be needed anyway.
You can always provide an anonymous login to the wookie or shinding environment and do autenthication hardcoded... But... let's wait a little bit! :D E l mar, 12-03-2013 a las 11:46 +0530, rajandeep vij escribió:T he other day I was also looking on rendering of widgets on the page > > rendered simultaneously. > > For now I have planned to have a new page (a non editable page) for which > login page will have a link. The same way other links work on the login > page... new account etc.,. > > But rave has security restrictions on rendering of the widgets, for which I > should pass an authenticated/authorized user Id. Now for an anonymous user > what shall be done? > > How do I bypass authorization checks for this anonymous user? > > Any suggestions? > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > But one thing I don't understand as of now is how would I render > > widgets on > > > > Login page without a proper page being created w/o tabs etc. > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure it's really possible given the structure of Rave. Maybe > > > someone else can give you some pointers here if there is a work around. > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > since I have investigated the rendering pipe in depth I think this is > > currently not possible as is on 0.21. > > > > This is because JSP tags are deeply nested and inner ones need the > > information of the outer ones, and you cannot get the inner ones out of > > current layout. You also need a layout, but I think this can be taken > > out of the page.jsp page and transferred to another one. > > > > Unfortunately TABS are needed since they define layout, loaded widgets > > and some other page requirements. Taking this apart will need some > > work. > > > > I'm developing a different frontend based on wicket instead of JSP... > > > > I will try to take this requirement on my current wicket frontend. If > > you handle to get around the need of login to show widget maybe it will > > work. > > > > Hope it helps. > > > > > > > >
