There are some resources:
https://docs.iota.org/docs/iota-basics/0.1/concepts/trinary?q=trinary&highlights=trinari https://blog.iota.org/iota-and-cybercrypt-announce-new-lightweight-trinary-cryptographic-hash-function-678e741315e8 There is also this company called Jinn. They design some kind of chip. The short answer is: With the chip the computation should be faster. We designed a custom crypto hash function to be used on this ternary chip: https://blog.iota.org/iota-and-cybercrypt-announce-new-lightweight-trinary-cryptographic-hash-function-678e741315e8 There are some conflicts regarding this topic from non IoT industry users. So, I want to know what people in the IoT industry think about this. best regards Philipp Am 2019-04-01 08:35, schrieb Emmanuel Baccelli: > Hi Philipp > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 6:22 AM Philipp Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Do you think ternary is the next step to improve efficiency in the IoT? >> (yes/no) > > I'm sure you have a default pointer to a paper / explanation why IOTA chose > to use ternary balanced (instead of bytes). > Could you point us to that? > > Cheers > > Emmanuel > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/users
