+1 Best Regards, Von Gosling
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 3:14 PM, heng du <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello RocketMQ Community, > > This is the discussion for the release of rocketmq-ons 1.0.0. > > As discussed in the mailing list: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0b2dfbb3b722bb8d710d8bd9d264d51013153608934d1a1c90c810de@%3Cusers.rocketmq.apache.org%3E > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0b2dfbb3b722bb8d710d8bd9d264d51013153608934d1a1c90c810de@%3Cusers.rocketmq.apache.org%3E>, > most of rocketmq users think it would be nice if there's a lightweight > client. and most of rocketmq users agree that the light-weight client should > be a high-level client that provides better abstraction and hide the internal > concepts and > implementation details as much as possible. Most important of all, to be on > the safe side, the new client should remove the admin interface, because of > the admin interface directly expose to the ordinary developer will pose a > risk to the server side. > > Based on the discussion above, the rocketmq community developed a lightweight > client named as ONS. Currently, this client has implemented all the basic > features related to Producer/Consumer, and at the same time, > order/batch/transactional message, etc. advanced features are also supported > in this client. This also indicates that the client already has a high > maturity. So, in order to continually improve this lightweight client, we > hope to release the first version and optimize the client based on the > problems found during the actual production environment use process. > > Welcome everyone to comment in this email, and if no other sounds, I would > like to call for a vote for this release :-) > > Thanks, > The Apache RocketMQ Team
