Dear RocketMQ Community:

    We'd like to propose a RIP-18 about improving the performance of 
SYNC_MASTER. According our benchmark and other users' feedback, the performance 
of SYNC_MASTER is only about of 1/10 of ASYNC_MASTER. Sometimes the performance 
as well as data durability is both needed, therefore it is important to improve 
performance of SYNC_MASTER. Since it's a relative large change and on the 
critical path, we propose this RIP. Welcome to discuss and join.

    [1] 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WBBdgCyetWTUcLcTuR832-OhNlkLJWR2PhPymeWQMBs/edit?usp=sharing

    Best Regards
    Shen Hui

Reply via email to