-1 Version is not correct. [image: image.png] heng du <duhengfore...@apache.org> 于2022年3月10日周四 21:44写道：
> +1 > checked: > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > release. > [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > [OK] License and Notice are correct in source package. > [OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > [OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > [OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > [OK] The code can be built success in the source package. > [ok] The code can be built success in the source package. > [ok] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start > [ok] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct > > ShannonDing <ding...@apache.org> 于2022年3月9日周三 10:57写道： > >> +1, >> Use Git tag for the release link: >> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/5.0.0-alpha >> >> >> >> >> checked: >> [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. >> [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. >> [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current >> release. >> [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. >> [OK] License and Notice are correct in source package. >> [OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package. >> [OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. >> [OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. >> [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. >> [OK] The code can be built success in the source package. >> >> >> >> At 2022-03-08 17:14:45, "jinrongtong" <jinrongt...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hello RocketMQ Community, >> >> This is the vote for 5.0.0-alpha of Apache RocketMQ. >> >> This release contains some important new features, including static topic >> and batch consume queue. >> >> >> The artifacts: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.0.0-ALPHA-rc1/ >> >> >> The staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1082 >> >> >> Git tag for the release: >> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/5.0.0-alpha >> >> >> Hash for the release tag: >> be750f0e3340aea15c38368b3542888a5f40b8d9 >> >> >> Release Notes: >> https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-5.0.0-ALPHA/ >> >> >> The artifacts have been signed with Key >> EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys >> file: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS >> >> >> >> >> Checklist for reference, >> Note that this is not an official policy but may help with checking >> releases. >> Fill in the following: >> >> >> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. >> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. >> [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release. >> [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. >> [] License and Notice are correct in source package. >> [] License and Notice are correct in binary package. >> [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. >> [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. >> [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. >> [] The code can be built success in the source package. >> [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start >> [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct >> >> >> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to >> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of >> votes are reached. >> >> >> Please vote accordingly: >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> The Apache RocketMQ Team >> >> >> >> >> > >
