+1, I checked<br/>[ok] Run clusterList command to see if the version is
correct<br/>[ok] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source
package.<br/>[ok] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary
package.<br/>[ok] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the
current release.
At 2022-03-11 11:43:46, "jinrongtong" <jinrongt...@apache.org> wrote:
>Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
>
>This is the vote for 5.0.0-alpha rc2 of Apache RocketMQ.
>This release contains some important new features, including static topic and
>batch consume queue.
>
>
>The artifacts:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.0.0-ALPHA-rc2/
>
>
>The staging repo:
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1083
>
>
>Git tag for the release:
>https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/5.0.0-alpha
>
>
>Hash for the release tag:
>a17fa7605cfbd266e4468e6fe2d6cf6711572111
>
>
>Release Notes:
>https://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-5.0.0-ALPHA/
>
>
>The artifacts have been signed with Key
>EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys file:
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
>
>
>
>Checklist for reference,
>Note that this is not an official policy but may help with checking releases.
>Fill in the following:
>
>
>[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>[] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>[] License and Notice are correct in source package.
>[] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
>[] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>[] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>[] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>[] The code can be built success in the source package.
>[] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>[] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
>
>And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this
>email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes
>are reached.
>
>
>Please vote accordingly:
>
>
>[ ] +1 approve
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>The Apache RocketMQ Team
