Hello RocketMQ Community,

The Apache RocketMQ vote is now closed and has passed with [3] binding +1s, [2] 
non-binding +1s and no 0 or -1;


Binding votes +1s:

heng du(duhengfore...@apache.org)
RongtongJin(jinrongt...@apache.org)
ShannonDing(ding...@apache.org)


Non-binding votes +1s:

Hu Zongtang(huzongt...@apache.org)
nize(k...@apache.org)




The release will be published soon.


Thanks,
The Apache RocketMQ Team






在 2022-09-14 20:29:29,"nize" <uncleran...@gmail.com> 写道:
>+1
>
>I checked:
>[OK] verify the hash for release tag and docker image is correct
>[OK] check LICENSE, should be Apache V2!
>
>Hu Zongtang <zongtan...@hotmail.com> 于2022年9月14日周三 17:11写道:
>
>> +1
>>
>> I checked:
>> ok check LICENSE, should be Apache V2!
>> ok check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
>> necessary !
>> ok deploy Apache RocketMQ by Operator!
>>
>> And By the way, I think we can disscuss the roadmap and releasing period
>> times for Apache RocketMQ Operator project in the meeting of Apache
>> RocketMQ Community!
>> ________________________________
>> 发件人: jinrongto...@163.com <jinrongto...@163.com> 代表 jinrongtong <
>> jinrongt...@apache.org>
>> 发送时间: 2022年9月14日 9:48
>> 收件人: users@rocketmq.apache.org <users@rocketmq.apache.org>
>> 抄送: dev <d...@rocketmq.apache.org>
>> 主题: Re:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ Operator 0.3.0
>>
>> +1, I checkd
>> [OK] verify the hash for release tag
>> [OK] the release note is clear
>>
>>
>>
>> At 2022-09-14 09:20:09, "heng du" <duhengfore...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I checked:
>> ok check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>> ok check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
>> necessary
>> ok deploy Apache RocketMQ by Operator
>>
>>
>>
>> Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> 于2022年9月13日周二 11:25写道:
>>
>> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>>
>>
>> This is the vote for 0.3.0 release of Apache RocketMQ Operator.
>>
>> In this release, accessing Apache RocketMQ from outside the Kubernetes
>> cluster is available, the addresses of Name Servers can be set
>> automatically, memory limit in container is sensible so that calculation of
>> JVM parameters is more accurate. The version of operator-sdk has been
>> updated to 1.16. Also, the docker repository for rocketmq-operator has been
>> moved to an official repository under Apache.
>>
>>
>>
>> Docker image for Apache RocketMQ Operator: apache/rocketmq-operator:0.3.0
>>
>> Docker image repo:
>>
>> https://hub.docker.com/layers/apache/rocketmq-operator/0.3.0/images/sha256-7fe24ce7cbac5fca29b6d0b2412e388de084b19ce1ac189734661b94037d49c7?context=explore
>>
>>
>> Git tag and release notes for the release:
>> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-operator/releases/tag/0.3.0
>>
>>
>> Hash for the release tag:
>> 23fb2eb094470d60b964aef8539f4a4ae3a752c6
>>
>>
>> Checklist for reference:
>> Note that this is not an official policy but may help with checking
>> releases.
>>
>> Fill in the following:
>> [ ]  check LICENSE, should be Apache V2
>> [ ]  check NOTICE, should have a notice for third-party dependency if
>> necessary
>> [ ]  verify the hash for release tag and docker image is correct
>> [ ]  deploy Apache RocketMQ by Operator
>>
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number
>> of votes are reached.
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>>
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>>

Reply via email to