+1
i checked

[]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[]  The code can be built success in the source package.
[]  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[]  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct

周波 <zhouboat...@gmail.com> 于2023年5月16日周二 11:47写道:

> +1
>
> aaron ai <aaro...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 11:35写道:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:27 AM jinrongtong <jinrongt...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>>>
>>> This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
>>>
>>> This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>>>
>>> The artifacts:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
>>>
>>> The staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
>>>
>>> Git tag for the release:
>>> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
>>>
>>> Hash for the release tag:
>>> e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Release Notes:
>>> https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>>> EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys
>>> file:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>>>
>>> Checklist for reference,
>>> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
>>> releases.
>>> Fill in the following:
>>>
>>> []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>>> []  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>>> []  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>>> release.
>>> []  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>>> []  License and Notice are correct in source package.
>>> []  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
>>> []  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>>> []  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>>> []  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>>> []  The code can be built success in the source package.
>>> []  Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>>> []  Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>>>
>>> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
>>> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
>>> votes are reached.
>>>
>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to