+1 On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:44 PM fuyou <fuyou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> 于2023年9月24日周日 18:20写道： > > > +1(Non-binding) > > I've checked: > > > > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > > [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > > release. > > [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > > [OK] The code can be built success in the source package. > > [OK] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start > > [OK] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct > > > > > > > > At 2023-09-22 15:10:28, "L K" <xdk...@outlook.com> wrote: > > >Hello RocketMQ Community, > > > > > >This is the vote for 5.1.4 of Apache RocketMQ. > > > > > >This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability. > > > > > >The artifacts: > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.4-rc1/ > > > > > >The staging repo: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1248 > > > > > >Git tag for the release: > > >https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/rocketmq-all-5.1.4 > > > > > > > > >Hash for the release tag: > > >1a681bdf9b5c5ab0be446d6394c0cac8768f45d9 > > > > > >Release Notes: > > >https://rocketmq.apache.org/release-notes/2023/09/22/5.1.4 > > > > > > > > >The artifacts have been signed with Key : > > >29BC31E655493EBB19C282CB3D92684D7041016B, which can be found in the keys > > file: > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS > > > > > >Checklist for reference, > > >Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking > releases. > > >Fill in the following: > > > > > >[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package. > > >[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package. > > >[] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > release. > > >[] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release. > > >[] License and Notice are correct in source package. > > >[] License and Notice are correct in binary package. > > >[] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. > > >[] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. > > >[] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts. > > >[] The code can be built success in the source package. > > >[] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start > > >[] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct > > > > > >And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to > > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback. > > > > > >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of > > votes are reached. > > > > > >Please vote accordingly: > > > > > >[ ] +1 approve > > > > > >[ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > >The Apache RocketMQ Team > > > > > -- > ============================================= > > fuyou001 > Best Regards >
