+1
At 2024-03-01 15:15:55, "Zhouxiang Zhan" <zhouxz...@gmail.com> wrote: >+1 > >On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:35 PM Gaoyang Cai <ca...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At 2024-02-20 14:16:45, "jinrongtong" <jinrongt...@apache.org> wrote: >> >Hello RocketMQ Community, >> > >> > >> > >> >This is the vote for the 2.3.0 release of Apache RocketMQ-Spring. >> > >> > >> > >> >The artifacts: >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-spring/2.3.0-rc1/ >> > >> > >> >The staging repo: >> >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1310 >> > >> > >> >Git tag for the release: >> > >> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-spring/releases/tag/rocketmq-spring-all-2.3.0 >> > >> > >> >Hash for the release tag: >> >8b4a5417e86d1f22e60ac62d37c60104172be423 >> > >> > >> >Release Notes: >> > >> https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2024/02/19/release-notes-rocketmq-spring-2.3.0 >> > >> > >> >The artifacts have been signed with Key : >> >EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys >> file: >> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS >> > >> > >> >Checklist for reference, >> >Note that this is not an official policy but may help with checking >> releases. >> > >> > >> >Fill in the following: >> >[ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for source package. >> >[ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current >> release. >> >[ ] License and Notice are correct in source package. >> >[ ] All files have license headers in source package if necessary. >> >[ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. >> >[ ] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo are matching the current artifacts. >> >[ ] The code can be built success in the source package. >> > >> > >> >And any other checkpoint is welcomed and please feel free to reply to >> this email, we sincerely hope for your feedback. >> >The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until a necessary number >> of votes are reached. >> > >> > >> >Please vote accordingly: >> >[ ] +1 approve >> >[ ] +0 no opinion >> >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >Thanks, >> >Rongtong Jin >>
