Hi Carlos
I don't have website, and glad to publish it as a full article with the
code.
and about another questions, i will reply soon.
Hi Piotr
Thanks for the example, I'll study it to learn more about royale.
Hi Alex
Thanks for your reply. following is my thought
1. ...Try DataContainer. I think it is used in the ASDoc example.
I can't find any example in ASDoc, does the ASDoc location here
<http://royale.apache.org/asdoc/#!org.apache.royale.html/DataContainer> ?
2. ...I thought this was working. I will look more into it this
weekend. Did you try public vs private static var?
private is fine, public has error. and I will do more test case.
3. ...ArrayList.removeAll().........Looks like Piotr answer this.
If removeAll() need to use another Beads, I think it is not intuitive for
developer.
Agree Beads is a good design, but databinding is why flex attracting me.
My thought is databinding is core value and should be easy to use. Beads
should be use for expand UI component additional functionality.
In fact, I do not like ApplicationDataBinding / ViewDataBinding /
ContaninerDataBinding / ItemRendererDataBinding
Because UI always handle data, almost all UI need to add DataBinding Beads
and need to know what kind to add.
I love flex because it's high produtivity, it is easy to use, that developer
can focus on their business logic.
4. ...Can you show us in code what you want to do? Keep in mind that
Vector doesn’t really exist in JS so will be implemented as an Array.
I know JS has no Vector. but my benchmark is TypeScript. TypeScript has
Generics. We need it in large application.
5. ...Is this the way it is working now or the way you want it to work?
I don’t know that we have focus events working properly..
Haha.. Sorry for my pool english. I mean it is working now. following test
steps
Type a character --- trigger change event
Focus out --- trigger another change event (I think this is unreasonable)
8. ...What do you want to happen if there is a route specified?..
The Use case will be some one call my application from a url link, and my
application can respond the right view
9. ...I think that should work, although we do not recommend altering
typeNames in application code....
Yes, you are right, my mistake to use typeNames. I should use className.
--
Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/
