Hi Taro! really great! :) as Piotr said, I think the best way is to create a PR so we can take a look at the code.
As I comment various times in this list, I'll hope we can improve over the Flex Validators. Let me explain: In Flex, Validation is attached to UI components and not to data to validate. Instead of that Granite Data Services, had validation through metadata I think that approach was better, since you can "check" data in the data object, and make UI components reflect if is valid of not in response. But the validation could be done in a controller and not in the UI like in Flex validation. I'd like to have this implemented in Jewel. Could we work together on that front? Thanks! and waiting to know about your thoughts! :) El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 10:24, Piotr Zarzycki (< [email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Taro, > > Many Many Thanks for that effort. Whatever you have the pull request is > the best option, so go ahead and make it. We will review your code and > provide any feedback. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > czw., 30 sie 2018 o 03:14 Taro.Yu <[email protected]> napisał(a): > >> Hello >> >> After study the JewelExample, and search the GitHub, I can't find >> Validator >> like Flex (only some test >> items in mustella/tests) >> >> So I try to write some validator beads for Jewel Components >> >> Here is live demo >> https://z3idxk1hh5asgqpvhvftra-on.drv.tw/royale-heroes/JewelExample/ >> <https://z3idxk1hh5asgqpvhvftra-on.drv.tw/royale-heroes/JewelExample/> >> >> <http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/file/t55/Image1.png> >> >> How do I contribute it to Apache ? Just create Pull Request ? >> do I need to prepare some document to explain the Validators ? >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://apache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com/ >> > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: > > > > > > *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki-- Carlos > Rovirahttp://about.me/carlosrovira <http://about.me/carlosrovira> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > >
