Hi Alex,
1.
Found : goog.require('com.likya.pinara.model.ModelLocator');
in : PinaraUI_mx_managers_SystemManager.js
2.
[Bindable]
private static var modelLocator:ModelLocator =
ModelLocator.getInstance();
It is initialized a the beginning and than only called.
Source :
package com.likya.pinara.model
{
public class ModelLocator
{
private static var modelLocator:ModelLocator;
public static function getInstance():ModelLocator
{
if(modelLocator == null)
{
modelLocator = new ModelLocator();
}
return modelLocator;
}
[Bindable]
public var currentUser:User;
[Bindable]
public var currentBusyCursorId:int;
[Bindable]
public var appInfo:AppInfo;
}
}
Thanks,
Serkan
1.12.2018 10:05 tarihinde Alex Harui yazdı:
Hi Serkan,
Scan all of the .js files to see if goog.require of ModelLocator is in
any of the files.
The workaround is to do something like this:
Current code: static public var myModelLocator:ModelLocator = new
ModelLocator();
Workaround: static public var myModelLocator:ModelLocator; // leave
uninitialized
Then find the first use of myModelLocator and have the code check it
first:
If (myModelLocator == null)
myModelLocator = new ModelLocator();
HTH,
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş <[email protected]>
*Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Date: *Friday, November 30, 2018 at 9:19 PM
*To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: Work on Emulation
Hi Alex,
1.12.2018 01:31 tarihinde Alex Harui yazdı:
I am also getting the unreachable code in SystemManager, but that
shouldn’t matter right now.
Okay
The TypeError is the current main issue. A problem like that can
result in the following errors. Please make sure you copied the
log info correctly. It looks like some text was cut.
I guess it is completely what i see :
cid:[email protected]
Is there a ModelLocator.js file somewhere?
cid:[email protected]
Is it in the goog.require list for PinaraUI.js?
Looked in PinaraUI.js, not found.
You might be able to work around the error by initializing that
static variable “later” in the main app.
I am not sure i got what you mean.
Regarding Closure Compiler and memory, make sure you spelled the
options correctly:
https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/docs/compilation_levels
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.google.com%2Fclosure%2Fcompiler%2Fdocs%2Fcompilation_levels&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbef1552927504382071408d6574c7efc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636792383411928494&sdata=d70GlXf3zh4Aqcv9N1UJ%2BOeE6sERkeMPOMbnOwxe704%3D&reserved=0>
I was working with :
https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/docs/api-tutorial3
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdevelopers.google.com%2Fclosure%2Fcompiler%2Fdocs%2Fapi-tutorial3&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbef1552927504382071408d6574c7efc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636792383411928494&sdata=zuOJXLXnItpuvu9BnXs%2FfG3AUiiEDrYcXUE5zwJq%2B9c%3D&reserved=0>
do you mean "-js-compiler-option SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS" ? Then i
guess okay but check it again.
One last thing to try is to manually determine the commands to
Closure Compiler and try calling it directly from the
command-line, but you just might have too many files. If you can
figure out the command-line parameters and get Closure Compiler to
fail without being launched by the Royale Compiler, then you could
ask the Google Closure folks for help.
Needs more work and time.
Otherwise, you will have to reduce the number of files in the main
app and move some to modules.
Sure looks like the easier path, any example or sample to begin,
kindly appreciated.
Thanks,
Serkan
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Reply-To: *"[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Date: *Friday, November 30, 2018 at 1:39 PM
*To: *"[email protected]" <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: Work on Emulation
Hi Alex,
1.12.2018 00:28 tarihinde Alex Harui yazdı:
Hi Serkan,
The error you showed indicates that
PinaraUI_mx_managers_SystemManager.js,
mx.managers.SystemManager.js and PinaraUI.js and probably some
other files did get loaded. In theory, depending on your
browser settings, you should be able to test the bin/js-debug
code by loading from file:// <file:///> instead of http:// and
bypass your embedded server.
*I tried but not insisted, you mean that I can test without
server, okay i will go by that way :
Firefox console:
**
unreachable code after return statement[Daha fazla bilgi
al]SystemManager.js:196:2
*
*TypeError: com.likya.pinara.model is undefined[Daha fazla bilgi
al]****PinaraUI.js**:272:1***
*<anonim>****file:///D:/dev/royale-emulation-works/github/bin/js-debug/com/likya/pinara/main/PinaraUI.js**:272:1***
*
unreachable code after return statement[Daha fazla bilgi
al]JobListWithDetails.js:522:4*
*
TypeError: this.info(...) is undefined[Daha fazla bilgi
al]SystemManager.js:221:40*
*mx.managers.SystemManager.prototype.start****file:///D:/dev/royale-emulation-works/github/bin/js-debug/mx/managers/SystemManager.js**:221:40**<anonim>file:///D:/dev/royale-emulation-works/github/bin/js-debug/index.html:1662:44*
*
********************************
And sources generated :
*
*
**PinaraUI.js (272)
/**
* @private
* @type {com.likya.pinara.model.ModelLocator}
*/
com.likya.pinara.main.PinaraUI.com_likya_pinara_main_PinaraUI_modelLocator_
= com.likya.pinara.model.ModelLocator.getInstance();
SystemManager.js:221
*
var /** @type {Array} */ mixinList = this.info()["mixins"];
You will not get a .JS file in bin/js-release until you can
find a way to keep Google Closure Compiler from having that GC
overhead error.
*I increased memory 6G with -Xmx : failed...
used -XX:-UseGCOverheadLimit : failed
used -js-compiler-option SATANDART_OPTIMIZATIONS and
-js-compiler-option ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS : failed.
I do not know what can i try next :)
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at java.util.HashMap.newNode(Unknown Source)
at java.util.HashMap.putVal(Unknown Source)
at java.util.HashMap.putMapEntries(Unknown Source)
at java.util.HashMap.<init>(Unknown Source)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.newtypes.NaivePersistentMap.with(NaivePersistentMap.java:37)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.newtypes.TypeEnv.putType(TypeEnv.java:79)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.NewTypeInference.envPutType(NewTypeInference.java:4150)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.NewTypeInference.updateLvalueTypeInEnv(NewTypeInference.java:3443)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.NewTypeInference.analyzeAssignFwd(NewTypeInference.java:1947)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.NewTypeInference.analyzeExprFwd(NewTypeInference.java:1520)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.NewTypeInference.analyzeExprFwd(NewTypeInference.java:1430)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.NewTypeInference.analyzeFunctionFwd(NewTypeInference.java:1036)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.NewTypeInference.analyzeFunction(NewTypeInference.java:892)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.NewTypeInference.process(NewTypeInference.java:518)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.PhaseOptimizer$NamedPass.process(PhaseOptimizer.java:307)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.PhaseOptimizer.process(PhaseOptimizer.java:233)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.Compiler.check(Compiler.java:1084)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.Compiler.performChecksAndTranspilation(Compiler.java:884)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.Compiler.access$000(Compiler.java:102)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.Compiler$2.call(Compiler.java:818)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.Compiler$2.call(Compiler.java:815)
at
com.google.javascript.jscomp.CompilerExecutor$2.call(CompilerExecutor.java:93)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)*
HTH,
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Reply-To: *"[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Date: *Friday, November 30, 2018 at 1:23 PM
*To: *"[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: Work on Emulation
Hi Alex,
http server is embedded and custom and currently can not load
dependent files from index.html automatically. Can just
download index.html.
eg. can not load basic.js from \library\closure\goog.
in release folder, there are two files :
index.html
PinaraUI.min.css
so not completed and not minified i guess.
Thanks,
Serkan
1.12.2018 00:03 tarihinde Alex Harui yazdı:
Hi Serkan,
I don’t think I understand. Loading all of these JS files
is only during debugging. Once the JS files are correct,
the optimizer in Google Closure Compiler will generate one
JS file. I would not expect the errors you showed in your
last post to be related to HTTP Server. It is more likely
due to a mistake in the order we load the JS files, or a
JS files is missing from the output.
HTH,
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Reply-To: *"[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Date: *Friday, November 30, 2018 at 12:27 PM
*To: *"[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: Work on Emulation
Thanks Alex,
I think at this point i need to modify my java server
application.
While using flex, it was easy to define and load small
amount of files via the custom embedded http server.
But for royale, i need to improve the http handler for
multiple files loading automatically from the relative
paths. This is the reason of the error, can not fined the
included js files.
This will take sometime. Will come back :)
Serkan.
30.11.2018 23:12 tarihinde Alex Harui yazdı:
What is the code around PinaraUI.js line 272? As you
resolve those issues, more and more of the code should
run.
-Alex
*From: *Serkan Taş <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Reply-To: *"[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Date: *Friday, November 30, 2018 at 12:06 PM
*To: *"[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: Work on Emulation
correction : index.html is created but has some errors.
PinaraUI.js:272 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read
property 'ModelLocator' of undefined
at PinaraUI.js:272
(anonymous) @ PinaraUI.js:272
SystemManager.js:221 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read
property 'mixins' of undefined
at
PinaraUI_mx_managers_SystemManager.mx.managers.SystemManager.start
(SystemManager.js:221)
at index.html:1662
mx.managers.SystemManager.start @ SystemManager.js:221
(anonymous) @ index.html:1662
30.11.2018 23:03 tarihinde Serkan Taş yazdı:
Hi Alex,
29.11.2018 23:49 tarihinde Alex Harui yazdı:
Hi Serkan,
Look like it is the Google Closure Compiler
that is reporting this problem.
Here’s a link to options for JVM:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1393486/error-java-lang-outofmemoryerror-gc-overhead-limit-exceeded
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fquestions%2F1393486%2Ferror-java-lang-outofmemoryerror-gc-overhead-limit-exceeded&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cbef1552927504382071408d6574c7efc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636792383411938498&sdata=eqOLwGsU9z9YksoxB8M9noUWUfJVyzx%2FW0lbsdIKMXY%3D&reserved=0>
I don’t know if it cares if you use “G” or “g”
but the article uses “g”.
*I had already tried those in the link but not
succeeded. So searching for alternatives. *
You can also try using -js-compiler-options to
pass different options to the Google Closure
Compiler, such as SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS.
However if you are not getting any SEVERE
errors at this point, you can probably try
running the bin/js-debug/index.html.
*Unfortunately the index is generated, broken
somewhere in the middle. I am going to look
-js-compiler-options and SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS*
In the end, you may need to break up your code
into smaller sets of files via Modules.
I already have some models but i see that still
too big for closure to compile, although i thought
it was not.
HTH,
-Alex
Thanks,
Serkan
*From: *Serkan Taş
<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Reply-To: *"[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Date: *Thursday, November 29, 2018 at 1:48 AM
*To: *"[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: Work on Emulation
*java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit
exceeded*
