Alex, thanks. The reason is to build my mxml.
Best regards, 2019年2月25日(月) 19:07 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > Hi Takeshita-san, > > > > As the others explained, the example isn’t set up for Maven. It is a > “fewest changes” migration from Flex and Flex didn’t support Maven so the > folder structure of the sources is not conducive to Maven and I don’t want > to spend the time making those kinds of changes. > > > > Why do you want to build it yourself? You can grab all of the output > files from here: > http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/TourDeFlexMigration/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules/bin/js-debug/ > > > > If you are just looking to do some testing, there is an example in this > comment: > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/391#issuecomment-463181901 > > > > HTH, > > -Alex > > > > > > *From: *Takeshita Shoichiro <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Sunday, February 24, 2019 at 2:29 AM > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: Migrating an app from Apache Flex to Apache Royale (tweet > thread) > > > > Alex, > > > > I tried to build tourdeflexmodules (incl. AdvancedDataGridExample.mxml) > but seemed fail. (no result) > > > > Under the following directory, I ran mvn clean install. > > > > \royale-asjs\royale-asjs\examples\mxroyale > > > > Did I use the wrong procedure? > > > > Appreciate your advice. > > > > Best regards, > > > > S. Takeshita > > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 3:33 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > First, lower your expectations 😉 > > > > Then, make a copy of your code. > > And read this: > https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/create-an-application/migrate-an-existing-app/migrate-from-flex.html > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapache.github.io%2Froyale-docs%2Fcreate-an-application%2Fmigrate-an-existing-app%2Fmigrate-from-flex.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d5cba5372d7412f141408d69a42e960%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636866009536024185&sdata=aI4nV%2BsLNqDwJboZdVsxeUSy70W0afVDWprebWy%2BiVQ%3D&reserved=0> > > > > Good luck. I’m about to stop work for today as I am on the road in the > middle of the US. I’ll be back on the west coast of the US in about 24 > hours. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > *From: *Takeshita Shoichiro <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Friday, February 22, 2019 at 10:22 PM > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: Migrating an app from Apache Flex to Apache Royale (tweet > thread) > > > > Alex, got it. Cool. > > > > I would like to try conversion of our mxml using this emulation approach. > > To do that, how I can? Appreciate your help. > > > > Thank you, S. Takeshita > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 3:09 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Takeshita-san, > > > > For these examples, I also think the Royale version loads faster. It > makes some sense, especially from a clean cache, as the browser has to load > the player (essentially, downloading and starting an application), then > load and parse the SWF, then run it. The browser running a Royale app has > to load a pile of JS and CSS files, but the browsers have been optimizing > that over the past years. > > > > To see the Advanced DataGrid in the Royale migration of Tour De Flex, > first click on “MX Framework” then “Data Visualization”, then > “AdvancedDataGrid” and then on the “AdvancedDataGrid” that appears as a > child of the first one. It should show an AdvancedDataGrid with a > GroupingCollection. > > > > HTH, > > -Alex > > > > *From: *Takeshita Shoichiro <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Friday, February 22, 2019 at 10:04 PM > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: Migrating an app from Apache Flex to Apache Royale (tweet > thread) > > > > Alex, thanks for the link information. > > > > I understand Flash version takes more time for loading SWF than new Apache > Royale. Is my observation correct? > > > > It seems what I'm looking for is the Advanced Data Grid. It seems not > implemented in Royale yet. > > > > But anyway, the progress seems to be great. > > > > T-san > > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 2:28 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The examples using emulation components are in examples/mxroyale. The > most sophisticated example is a migration of a subset of Tour De Flex. It > is still a work in progress. The most current version is here: > http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/TourDeFlexMigration/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/examples/mxroyale/tourdeflexmodules/bin/js-debug/index.html > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2FTourDeFlexMigration%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fartifact%2Fexamples%2Fmxroyale%2Ftourdeflexmodules%2Fbin%2Fjs-debug%2Findex.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d5cba5372d7412f141408d69a42e960%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636866009536024185&sdata=CAbPHQig1AQ0LvYEn3PWDEYax4iV%2FXNLxHKX2hQN6zk%3D&reserved=0> > > > > The Flex version it is based on is here: > http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/index.html > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fflex.apache.org%2Ftourdeflex%2Findex.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d5cba5372d7412f141408d69a42e960%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636866009536034190&sdata=5V2TzEOF2mvnnzw5Flr7naTyFrUSdAdl3KomJ2LubYc%3D&reserved=0> > > > > The repos do not contain any serious example of migrating Flex to Basic > The focus of Basic was more about code size and performance than ease of > migration. We did migrate the FlexStore example. It is in > examples/royale/RoyaleStore. The source it is based on is here: > https://github.com/apache/flex-examples/tree/develop/FlexStore > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fflex-examples%2Ftree%2Fdevelop%2FFlexStore&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d5cba5372d7412f141408d69a42e960%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636866009536044195&sdata=tfAFYkNF%2BjaWk4IGRIp4Vm%2BU4QsPByt5BQ8aPj0NDHY%3D&reserved=0> > There aren’t any examples running on a server at the moment. Still, Harbs > ported his app to Basic and he can tell you more about it. > > > > -Alex > > > > *From: *Takeshita Shoichiro <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Friday, February 22, 2019 at 5:01 PM > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: Migrating an app from Apache Flex to Apache Royale (tweet > thread) > > > > Alex, > > > > Thanks a lot for providing me a set of choices to go. > > I need some time to decide after doing some benchmark. > > > > I'm interested in modern UI that may make users happy. And also need to > think about minimizing the migration effort to save time and money. > > > > Where can I find the more detailed information for (1) Basic set migration > examples and (2) migration with emulation? > > > > Best rega > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:00 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi T-San, > > There is no single perfect migration strategy for Royale. You will have > to choose a path. > > One way to think about migration is that there is your starting point, > some amount of work, and an ending point. > > Carlos just finished taking a bunch of MXML and AS, rewrote most of the > MXML, modified about 30% of the AS, and used the Jewel component set to end > up with an app with a very nice looking UI with modern UI components. If > you want a cool new UI because it is time to modernize and older Flex UI, > then Jewel is a good choice. > > A while ago, Harbs took a bunch of MXML and AS, rewrote most of the MXML, > not sure about how much of the AS he changed, but he used Basic set and > created a smaller faster application, but I don't think it has as many new > UI components. If you have concerns about size and performance and can > spend a bit more time rewriting more code and customizing your UI, then > using Basic is a good choice. > > A couple of folks that I know of are trying to use the Emulation set. The > goal of the emulation set is to minimize the amount of changes to your MXML > and AS. A fair amount of Tour De Flex has been migrated using the > Emulation components. There is still work to be done, but there were very > few changes to the MXML and AS. All of the changes are in the emulation > components. > > To me, the emulation components are the charitable way of helping the rest > of the folks migrating Flex apps who don't have the time or need for a > modernized UI and aren't too concerned about performance. Because, if you > use the emulation set and it doesn't run or look correct, then the fix is > to change the code in the emulation compoents and then every other user of > those components benefits from that change. If you choose one of the other > options and change your code, then only you benefit from that change. I > wish I could convince more of the other Royale committers to help with the > emulation components. As the clock marches towards 2020, folks will have > less and less time to move. > > If you choose to go with the emulation components (which has > AdvancedDataGrid working to some degree) then you are expected to try to > learn how to fix bugs in the emulation components yourself. In reality, > this is true for Jewel and Basic as well, but is especially true for the > emulation components because there are a lot more code paths to maintain. > > So, think about it, and pick one of the three strategies and let us know > what choice you make. And feel free to ask more questions. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 2/21/19, 4:46 AM, "T-san" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Carlos, > > Thanks for your advice and work. > > Let me clarify several things. > > 1. Do I need to convert mx coding to Jewel? > 2. If so, is there any useful information on how to do that? > 3. Is there user guide available for Jewel? Or I have to read the > Jewel > source to study? > > And if you have a time, would you make your sample code complete for > build? > I'd also need to know how to build it since at this moment I do not > know how > to create pom.xml. > > T-san > > > > > -- > Sent from: > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C73bc5071226444dab0f508d697faa246%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636863500060250570&sdata=NSR584KJpjT2fdd91uv%2BE3AwcAwwww8SdN3nA1LHgys%3D&reserved=0 > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-users.20374.n8.nabble.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8d5cba5372d7412f141408d69a42e960%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636866009536044195&sdata=r1qjxHmt7JX2dCIwG%2Br1%2B5vmseFblmDnwWfQH5YJ%2FEo%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > -- > > Shoichiro Takeshita > 武下 祥一郎 > > > > > -- > > Shoichiro Takeshita > 武下 祥一郎 > > > > > -- > > Shoichiro Takeshita > 武下 祥一郎 > > > > > -- > > Shoichiro Takeshita > 武下 祥一郎 > -- Shoichiro Takeshita 武下 祥一郎
