Hi Mark, Ok, yes, that repo is from someone who used the cairngorm swc I provided a few years back, the conversation was in the list archives. You can probably download it from that repo by clicking "download raw file" (icon off to the right) here: https://github.com/gustavodecarli/apache-royale-cairngorm/blob/master/Cairngorm/libs/cairngorm-js.swc
Or if that doesn't work you should be able to download this file: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/u871jv9z28b0stqeip2rf/cairngorm-royale-2.2.4-SNAPSHOT-js.swc?rlkey=1w9tle0xz76qduule6al3f4qt&st=d80ppvfk&dl=0 I will try to get some of these libs into github at some point. Just need to find the time... I'll leave Piotr to answer the Moonshine questions, he's the expert! Regards, Greg On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:59 AM MARK HARTNETT <m_hartn...@comcast.net> wrote: > Hi Greg, > I commented crux into the system and left Cairngorm in place. I found this > git site https://github.com/gustavodecarli/apache-royale-cairngorm.git > I couldn't clone it. > > Down to missing imports, bad imports, binding warnings. > Looks good and Moonshine is working well. > > Can Moonshine connect to the Royale Formatter? > > Thanks for your help > Mark Hartnett > > On 04/21/2024 4:15 PM EDT Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Mark, > > I seem to remember reading about why Adobe chose Cairngorm as the name for > that in the past, there was 'a reason' I think, but I can't remember it > now! > > Generally, in porting work from Flex to Royale, the easiest route is to > minimise changes to anything related to the business logic of the app, in > order to provide a solid foundation, because usually there is much more > work on the UI side. So if it were me, I would try to mirror as much as > possible of the original MVC/microarchitecture setup. > > However if you want to switch to Crux, and that works for you, then great! > > I will look for the Royale Cairngorm swc tonight my time, and provide that > in any case. I think you're not the first one to ask about that, there may > be old messages with links either in the dev or users mailing list. Either > way, I will follow up before tomorrow. > > -Greg > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 2:55 AM MARK HARTNETT <m_hartn...@comcast.net> > wrote: > > The Crux implementation is almost exactly what's there now. I have most of > it replaced. Cairngorm was a terrible name for software - I won't need the > swc after all. > > Thanks > > On 04/21/2024 10:44 AM EDT Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Mark, > > It's awesome to hear that. Switching to Crux would be nice and maybe quite > beneficial for Royale if you find and potentially maybe fix some issues. :) > > Piotr > > niedz., 21 kwi 2024 o 16:37 MARK HARTNETT <m_hartn...@comcast.net> > napisał(a): > > Hi Piotr, > The migration went well. I have a clean compile other than Cairngorm > errors. I will look at switching to Crux now instead of after bringing the > system back to life. I'd still like the Cairngorm just in case. > > Thanks > Mark > > On 04/21/2024 9:47 AM EDT Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Mark, > > I have let know Greg about that over private channel. Hopefully early next > week he will provide you some source code in that matter. :) > > Thanks, > Piotr > > niedz., 21 kwi 2024 o 14:04 MARK HARTNETT <m_hartn...@comcast.net> > napisał(a): > > Hi, > I'm in the middle of migrating and hoping someone has a Cairngorm.swc > ported for Royale. > > Thanks > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > >
