Send users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/mailman/listinfo/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [[email protected]: [Bug 42828]
rt2800pci unstable - chokes after too much I/O]
(Francisco Pina Martins)
2. Re: [[email protected]: [Bug 42828]
rt2800pci unstable - chokes after too much I/O]
(Francisco Pina Martins)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:49:29 +0000
From: Francisco Pina Martins <[email protected]>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>
Cc: Andreas Hartmann <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [[email protected]: [Bug
42828] rt2800pci unstable - chokes after too much I/O]
Message-ID:
<CAD0T5=tFFLPmUCapCHHF+E0FZT=ze04mkjTNtitAt0=cmco...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I have been testing Stanislaw's patch and I can confirm that it's quite an
improvement. It's even (very) slightly better (could be just chance) than
the LTS kernel I was using as control, under both good and bad receiving
conditions.
I'm still working on those graphs, expect them later today.
On 16 November 2012 15:07, Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:58:49PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > > The goal here is to fix regression caused by commit be03d4a45c, not
> > > to improve performance.
> >
> > Why do you think, I would think it would improve performance?
>
> Performance should be the same as it was before the commits were applied.
>
> Stanislaw
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/pipermail/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/attachments/20121120/03f83e3c/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:43:50 +0000
From: Francisco Pina Martins <[email protected]>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>
Cc: Andreas Hartmann <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [[email protected]: [Bug
42828] rt2800pci unstable - chokes after too much I/O]
Message-ID:
<CAD0T5=svssonwbktmgacxttlu_w-5jk2gen4yqagempe7ih...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Here are the graphs as promised. =-)
Test conditions once again:
* Good reception conditions:
The improvements are vast.
On 20 November 2012 09:49, Francisco Pina Martins
<[email protected]>wrote:
> I have been testing Stanislaw's patch and I can confirm that it's quite an
> improvement. It's even (very) slightly better (could be just chance) than
> the LTS kernel I was using as control, under both good and bad receiving
> conditions.
> I'm still working on those graphs, expect them later today.
>
>
>
> On 16 November 2012 15:07, Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:58:49PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> > > The goal here is to fix regression caused by commit be03d4a45c, not
>> > > to improve performance.
>> >
>> > Why do you think, I would think it would improve performance?
>>
>> Performance should be the same as it was before the commits were applied.
>>
>> Stanislaw
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/pipermail/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/attachments/20121120/f7d378ce/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/mailman/listinfo/users_rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
------------------------------
End of users Digest, Vol 45, Issue 18
*************************************
