Have you tried embedding your specific DbHelper in your SU instead of repackaging the component ? It may prove easier.
Anyway, what does 1 lead to ? Did you had to change the DbHelper for that ? Maybe you can post a diff so that we can review and discuss it ? On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Andrea Zoppello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Actually i'm using a customized version of servicemix-drools for the > following reasons: > > 1) I need to use db helper objects both in LHS, and in RHS of my drl files. > > 2) I need to specify a defaultTargetService URI if no rule would be true. > > At the moment i'm trying to apply the approach described here, to see if > it could feet my needs: > > http://gnodet.blogspot.com/2007/06/accessing-databases-in-servicemix.html > > but i found some problems: > > 1) the syntax described seems to be not correct, i don't know which is > the right value for > util namespace used. > > 2) With this approach Drools Db helper cannot be used on the LHS side of > the rules. > > Any idea?? > Until i don't resolve this i'm forced to mantain my own version that > simple assert a db helper > object in the working memory.. > > Andrea > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
