ohh ok... So these newest endpoints are not so new... :-) but now thre is
some documentation...

thanks

2008/2/25, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> They are available from ServiceMix >= 3.2
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Jérémy SEVELLEC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Ho sorry,
> >  I've got another question.
> >
> >  Is these newest jms endpoints available in the 3.2.1 version of
> ServiceMix?
> >  If it's in a new version of serviceMix and/or a new version of the jms
> >  component, is there some build available? (because of the last build is
> in
> >  the 3.2.1 version).
> >
> >  Jérémy.
> >
> >  2008/2/25, Jérémy SEVELLEC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > >
> >  > I'm trying this...
> >  >
> >  > thanks.
> >  >
> >  > 2008/2/25, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >  > >
> >  > > Yeah, it seems to be the implemented behavior in ActiveMQ.
> >  > > You should try using the new endpoints that are be able to provide
> >  > > this feature (through spring jms layer).
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Jérémy SEVELLEC <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  > > wrote:
> >  > > > I'm always using active MQ with this failover properties :
> >  > > >
> >  > > >  failover:tcp://localhost:61616
> >  > > >
> >  > > >  It's in this configuration that the deployment is stopped and is
> >  > > waiting for
> >  > > >  the arrival of the broker jms.
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >  2008/2/25, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > > >
> >  > > >  > If you use ActiveMQ, the client side implements a failover
> using
> >  > > >  >    failover:tcp://localhost:61616
> >  > > >  > See
> http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
> >  > > >  >
> >  > > >  > Else, you could try the new JMS endpoints which should have
> better
> >  > > >  > support for reconnection:
> >  > > >  >
> http://servicemix.apache.org/servicemix-jms-new-endpoints.html
> >  > > >  >
> >  > > >  >
> >  > > >  > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Jérémy SEVELLEC <
> >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  > > >  > wrote:
> >  > > >  > > Hi all,
> >  > > >  > >
> >  > > >  > >  I use ServiceMix 3.2.1
> >  > > >  > >
> >  > > >  > >  I ve got a jms service unit in consumer mode wich is
> listening a
> >  > > queue
> >  > > >  > of a
> >  > > >  > >  broker jms. This service Unit is embedded in a Service
> assembly.
> >  > > >  > >  If I depoy this service assembly in ServiceMix and if the
> broker
> >  > > jms is
> >  > > >  > not
> >  > > >  > >  working, serviceMix is waiting for the broker to finish the
> >  > > deployment.
> >  > > >  > >  So It's impossible to deploy a jms service unit if the
> broker
> >  > > jms is
> >  > > >  > not
> >  > > >  > >  working?
> >  > > >  > >  Is there something like "reconnection strategy" to :
> >  > > >  > >  - allow the end of the deployment if the other side don't
> work
> >  > > >  > >  - to reconnect when the other side is started.
> >  > > >  > >
> >  > > >  > >
> >  > > >  > >  Cordialement :-)
> >  > > >  > >  --
> >  > > >  > >  Jérémy
> >  > > >  > >
> >  > > >  >
> >  > > >  >
> >  > > >  >
> >  > > >  >
> >  > > >  > --
> >  > > >  > Cheers,
> >  > > >  > Guillaume Nodet
> >  > > >  > ------------------------
> >  > > >  > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >  > > >  >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > > >  --
> >  > > >  Jérémy
> >  > > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > --
> >  > >
> >  > > Cheers,
> >  > > Guillaume Nodet
> >  > > ------------------------
> >  > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Jérémy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  --
> >  Jérémy
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
Jérémy

Reply via email to