Yes, it is. The first one is to set the QoS so that the right flow is selected, but an easier one would be to set the "org.apache.servicemix.flow" property on the exchange to the name of the flow (seda, jms or jca).
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:03 PM, rgavlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have two service units, each with a single endpoint. These two service > units are each deployed on a cluster of SMX nodes, configured using JMSFlow. > I have a process that passes a message from endpoint1 to endpoint2. I need > to guarantee that endpoint2 is executed on the same JVM as the endpoint1 > that originated the message. Is this level of control possible? > > - Ron > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Flow-Control-Options-tp15651823s12049p15651823.html > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
