Currently, the aggregator create a message containing all the received messages.
There is no specific fault handling mechanism.

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:14 AM, sachin2008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Thanks for the reply....
>
>  But i have a doubt in the fault handling part in aggregator.How aggregator
>  will select only messages which is not having fault for aggregation.
>
>  Whether there is any property in the aggregator.
>
>
>
>
>  gnodet wrote:
>  >
>  > If tehre is a fault in echo1 component, the routing slip will be aborted
>  > and
>  > the fault will be sent back to the consumer, so echo2 won't receive it.
>  > A possible way would be to use the faultsTarget of the EIP pipeline to
>  > redirect faults somewhere else for a different processing.
>  > In any case, the aggregator must either receive faults, recognize them
>  > and process them as needed, or should timeout when all the messages
>  > are not received and send a fault itself.  The first solution would be
>  > better.
>  >
>  > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:37 AM, sachin2008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>
>  >>  Hi,
>  >>
>  >>  How to handle faults in case of EIP component..
>  >>
>  >>  Let's suppose if we will teke static routing slip.
>  >>
>  >>  <eip:static-routing-slip service="replaceMe:routingSlip"
>  >>  endpoint="endpoint">
>  >>     <eip:targets>
>  >>       <eip:exchange-target service="replaceMe:echo1" />
>  >>       <eip:exchange-target service="replaceMe:echo2" />
>  >>     </eip:targets>
>  >>   </eip:static-routing-slip>
>  >>
>  >>  In this routing slip will forward an inout message to replaceME:echo1
>  >> and
>  >>  then from replaceME:echo1 message will route to replaceMe:echo2.
>  >>  If there is any fault message will return from replaceMe:echo1 to
>  >>  replaceMe:echo2 then how we can handle these type of faults.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  Now let's consider we are using aggregator for aggregate the messages
>  >> coming
>  >>  from different components. If there is any fault occured in any of the
>  >>  component then aggregator how it handles the fault before aggregating
>  >> all
>  >>  the messages.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  Can anyone please put light on this fault handling
>  >>
>  >>  -----
>  >>  Cheers
>  >>  Praveen Oruganti
>  >>  "Think before you act and act on what you believe"
>  >>  --
>  >>  View this message in context:
>  >> http://www.nabble.com/Reg%3AFault-Handling-tp15731923s12049p15731923.html
>  >>  Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Cheers,
>  > Guillaume Nodet
>  > ------------------------
>  > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>  >
>  >
>
>
>  -----
>  Cheers
>  Praveen Oruganti
>  "Think before you act and act on what you believe"
>  --
>  View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Reg%3AFault-Handling-tp15731923s12049p15733465.html
>
>
> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to