I thank you for your help.
> There is one ActiveMQ broker per ServiceMix instance. When there are > multiple instances of ServiceMix the brokers can be networked for > broker-to-broker communication. > I have a question: AFAIY inside the JBI environment (by the way I think it includes NMR, BC/SE, doen't it?) service consumer/provider exchange their "JBI messages" (actually there is the MessageExchange that is fixed on each participant of the exchange, and NormalizedMessage are sent according to MEP, right?). But if the ServiceMix is distributed (several NMR each one with one broker merged into one logical NMR), the "JBI message" can be put on a queue managed by another broker. As ActiveMQ is based on JMS, does the broker act as a JMS BC to transfer the "JBI NormalizedMessage" from one NMR to the other? If yes, can't we use the ActiveMQ broker as a JMS BC? - I have another question about the JMS in service mix http://servicemix.apache.org/use-cases-whole.html in the "Department Store Distributor's Order Processing System" use case Why should we need the JCA container ? I thought that the NMR was in charge of managing the queues. By the way, in the caption: > # Resource Adapter: a resource adapter provides connectivity between a > specific external application and the ESB. In the Basic example the jencks > container provides a JMS resource adapater. > # Binding Component (BC): a BC provides connectivity to applications that > are external to the ESB. > Does "resource adapter" mean that the jenck container will communicate with SE through the NMR without passing through a BC? I am having fun with all this "theory" =) but I probably need to experiment the ESB to understand better... (tomorrow task ;)) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Distributed-ESB%3A-what-does-it-mean--tp16121615s12049p16183083.html Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
