Guillaume,

Thanks for the tip. For the JMS provider endpoint, is there a
destinationChooser object that will create a temporary queue and set it as
the replyDestination? I think the old JMS enpoint has this logic built-in.
Thanks again.


gnodet wrote:
> 
> The default marshaler for the <jms:consumer /> endpoint is configured to
> create an InOnly exchange, but there is a property you can set to create
> any other MEP.
> Try something like:
> 
> <jms:consumer service="my:ConsumerService"
>               endpoint="jbi"
>               destinationName="my.queue"
>               connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"
>               marshaler="#marshaler" />
> <bean id="marshaler" class="
> org.apache.servicemix.jms.endpoints.DefaultConsumerMarshaler">
>     <property name="mep" value="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out"; />
> </bean>
> 
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:26 AM, patmcg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to mask a request/response JMS service behind an HTTP Web
>> Service. I have this working with the "old" JMS endpoints. However my
>> understanding is that the "new" JMS endpoints are InOnly. Does that mean
>> I
>> can not implement this type of feature using the "new" JMS endpoints?
>>
>> If it really is possible, is there a recommended way to do this? If its
>> not
>> possible, then I would suggest updating the documentation to notify the
>> users of this shortcoming.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/HTTP-In-Out-SU-connection-to-new-JMS-Endpoint-tp16291331s12049p16291331.html
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/HTTP-In-Out-SU-connection-to-new-JMS-Endpoint-tp16291331s12049p16295029.html
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to