Btw, the servicemix-saxon should really be enhanced to support natively this pattern which is imho quite common. A single endpoint would be used and configured with one or two xslt and act as as a proxy between the consumer and the provider and perform the transformation on both ways.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, it's totally doable using servicemix-eip + any transformation > (servicemix-saxon). > The pipeline can be used if the exchange is InOnly. but if you have a > reply, this usually means that the exchange will be an InOut, in which case > you would use the eip static routing slip with the following targets: > * the request transformer > * the service to call > * the response transformer > This way, the canonical transformation can be done by the two > transformers. > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:55 PM, raulvk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to recover this question since it was not answered when > > originally posted and I am encountering the same escenario. (as you can > > see, > > I have done my duty of checking for past posts ;)) > > > > I am using ServiceMix to expose services offered by heterogeneous > > platforms > > to consumers who interact with the ESB instead of invoking the final > > services directly. > > > > However, the idea is to implement a Canonical Data Model, so that > > services > > are agnostic of the interfaces of one another. Hence, when a consumer > > invokes the ESB, it will do so in its Particular Data Model and the ESB > > should transform the message into the Canonical Data Model. (could use > > the > > pipeline pattern from servicemix-eip to achieve this). > > > > The call should then be routed to the final destination, where there > > would > > be another transformer that understands CDM and transforms the message > > to > > the format understood by the final system. > > > > If the service is synchronous, the same process should be repeated > > backwards. > > > > My first question is wheter ServiceMix is suitable for such a > > scenario... > > And if it is, how would I achieve it? > > > > Thanks a lot, > > > > Raul. > > > > > > Peter Klotz-2 wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > a question regarding transformers, it seems that when I have a > > component > > > that > > > implements TransformComponentSupport and send a InOut ME through this > > > transformer only the request is received by the onMessageExchange() > > but > > > not the > > > response. > > > > > > The onMessageExchange() method is called twice, once normal and once > > with > > > status > > > DONE. but both have as content of the in an out message the content of > > the > > > request. One never gets the response in the transformer. > > > > > > Now I need to have a transformer that does an action both on the > > request > > > and the > > > response of a InOut ME, how can I do this? > > > > > > req ---> +-------+ ----> +------+ > > > | trans | | comp | > > > resp <--- +-------+ <---- +------+ > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Peter > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/Transforming-request-and-response-tp5154324s12049p16304064.html > > Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
